#Gmsh approach face id how to
#Gmsh approach face id software
#Gmsh approach face id windows 7

#Gmsh approach face id software

I am not sure about the differences and advantages, so I go for the stuff I know.Īnyways, you are saying that 'Precise Match' means that the software uses the same global edge length for all parts. I use Cool(FEM) and have never touched Cool(BEM). 'When you select 'Precise Match' that means you advice software to use global edge length same for all parts. Mesh completed at Mon Jul 21 10:19:31 2014Įlements: not available, since meshing does not work properly Make sure it has no free edges, no non-manifolding edges and no intersections.Ī 3D mesh can be generated by launching meshing again. Please check the mesh by diagnostic tools and Mesh density defined on faces will not be used by this approach.Ī surface mesh has been created. Retrying the mesh process using a fallback tessellation method. Trying to recover from previous error(s).

Sequence and then click Create 3D Mold Mesh or Create 3D Channel Mesh. If you wish to mesh mold blocks or 3D channels, please include Cool(FEM) in analysis This process will not mesh mold blocks or 3D cooling channels. Relative edge length around gates: 20.0 % Maximum edge length in thickness direction: 0.5000 mmĪutomatic tetra aspect ratio control: Yes Minimum number of elements through the thickness: 10 Mesh on assembly contact faces: Precise Match Percentage of minimum curvature size vs global size: 20.0000 Processor type: GenuineIntel Intel64 Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7 ~3392 MHz

#Gmsh approach face id windows 7

Operating System: Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Portions of this software are covered by U.S. I appreciate all help, since I have right now no way to proceed with that problem!Ĭopyright Autodesk, Inc.

#Gmsh approach face id how to

Has anybody experience the same? Any suggestions or ideas how to solve the problem? I have no clue why there the software needs two attempts (for 'Ignore Contact' only one) and what happens using this alternative meshing method. Please find the complete analysis log below. Hence, an alternative method had to be used. Moreover, the analysis log gives me some information that there were two meshing attempts and something went wrong with the meshing. If I choose 'Precise Match' instead of 'Ignore contact' for the part mesh, the mesh is completed, but the mesh densities that I have set are not applied. Meshing the part with the default setting of 'Ignore contact' also works fine and the mesh looks like intended by the different mesh densities. However, the latter is where the problem arises. In order to get good results, I have to apply different mesh densities for all aforementioned elements and I would like to use the 'Precise Match' function for meshing. I plan to have the part, two mold inserts, and two 3D cooling structures in the model.